Labour’s new budget marks a return to the past, raising taxes to their highest level since 1993. With increased public investment, Chancellor Rachel Reeves aims to revive struggling services but risks alienating businesses and investors amid economic uncertainty.
The Labour government and Britain’s first female Chancellor in 800 years introduced its first budget on Wednesday. Notably, the first office holder was one Eustace of Fauconberg in 1221. Undoubtedly, it was received well by the public, particularly Labour voters, the less well-off, and the young. However, investors on Thursday displayed anxiety. Gilts, or UK government bonds, showed higher returns or borrowing costs. In addition, the pound sterling fell by 0.7% against the US dollar and 0.75% against the euro. The UK government essentially raised taxes to their highest level since 1993 in what appeared to be a sea shift. Certainly, what this budget signalled is a return to old Labour Party policy. Undoubtedly, an end to Britain as a cost competitive place to do business.
Rachel Reeves, the UK’s new Chancellor and the first woman to hold the office in 800 years, has presented a landmark budget.
This budget signals a bold departure from Britain’s recent low-tax approach, with higher taxes and increased public investment.
Reeves aims to address Britain’s struggling infrastructure and stagnant economy through sweeping spending increases and higher borrowing. The burden of funding this agenda, however, will fall largely on businesses.
Labour’s budget raises tax levels to historic heights and aims to restore public services
Labour’s economic plan raises Britain’s tax levels to historic heights. Reeves’ budget introduces an additional £40 billion in taxes, which will push the tax burden to an unprecedented 38% by 2030.
This will be Britain’s highest tax level on record, and the size of the state is forecasted to reach 44% of GDP. Labour argues that this approach, although painful, is essential to restore public services and set a new economic path for the UK. Critics, especially from the Conservative Party, have labelled the budget a return to the economic policies of the 1970s.
They argue that the plan risks damaging Britain’s position as a low-tax, globally competitive economy. Reeves, however, insists her budget is a realistic response to Britain’s economic challenges. She views this era of higher taxes as a temporary but necessary foundation for long-term growth.
Budget prioritises restoration of essential public services under significant strain
Reeves’ budget prioritises the restoration of public services, a long-standing issue in Britain. From overwhelmed hospitals to underfunded schools, essential services have operated under significant strain.
Reeves has made clear that Labour’s commitment goes beyond basic maintenance. This year, additional funds will support critical areas like ambulance services, healthcare, law enforcement, and social care.
Beyond operational spending, the government plans to invest £28 billion annually in capital projects, largely funded by borrowing. These projects include new housing, rail improvements, and extensive school repairs.
Labour’s budget aims to address two main objectives: rebuilding public services and shifting the economy toward sustainable growth. The budget, however, has faced criticism for its lack of clear productivity measures.
UK’s former ruling Conservative Party to announce a new leader on November 2 as contenders emerge
Britain’s productivity growth has been sluggish, and some argue the new taxes could further deter business investment, ultimately hindering economic growth.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts that the UK’s economic growth will remain below 2% over the next five years, casting doubt on Labour’s ability to drive a stronger economy.
Reeves’ long-term growth strategy counters immediate challenges from critics
Reeves counters that her strategy is built for a decade, not just the OBR’s five-year projection. She believes the foundations set by this budget will pay off in time, providing stability and state investment to attract private sector capital.
This is not a quick fix, Reeves argues, but a strategic shift designed to build business confidence and gradually stimulate growth.
The decision to front-load spending initiatives means Labour must sustain high taxes to prevent deficits from growing. Reeves presents her budget as a responsible approach to Britain’s immediate challenges.
She has focused tax hikes on businesses to avoid overwhelming individual taxpayers. However, Reeves chose not to extend the Conservative freeze on income tax thresholds, a move that leaves many workers feeling the pinch.
The decision to freeze fuel duty is seen as politically wise in a time of high energy costs, though it may challenge Labour’s green commitments.
Experts warn potential economic repercussions could affect working people negatively
While Reeves has tried to protect working people from heavy tax burdens, experts warn these costs could eventually pass down through reduced wages or job cuts.
If Labour’s gamble succeeds, public services will improve, and the political payoff could be substantial. However, Labour may face voter dissatisfaction if the promised economic benefits and service improvements do not materialise quickly enough.
Some critics argue that Labour’s approach risks creating an entrenched high-tax system that may be hard to reverse, even if economic growth eventually improves. Reeves has offered limited comments on long-term plans to reduce tax levels, leaving some to question if this high-tax phase is indeed temporary.
Labour traditionally promised better services without significantly raising taxes, but this budget marks a stark shift from that approach.
Budget signals decisive turn toward state-led investment and higher taxes in Britain
Labour’s budget represents a decisive turn toward state-led investment, adopting a tax structure similar to many European countries. Reeves is betting that sustained public investment will restore Britain’s infrastructure and public services while ultimately fostering higher growth.
But for this strategy to succeed, Labour must demonstrate careful spending, effective reforms, and visible improvements in services and economic growth.
The stakes are high. If public services improve and the economy accelerates, Labour’s budget could validate its vision of a stronger, fairer Britain.
But if growth falters or voters feel overtaxed, Labour could face backlash that impacts its long-term political future.
For now, Reeves has laid out a roadmap to “fix the foundations” of Britain’s economy. However, with many details still “to be confirmed,” voters remain cautiously optimistic, awaiting the results of this bold, untested strategy.
City reacts negatively to rising borrowing costs and fluctuations in currency exchange rates
Not so for the City. The government’s borrowing cost rose on Thursday. This increase came as gilt or UL bonds were set to rise in line with the Chancellor’s high borrowing requirement.
At the same time, the pound sterling fell against the dollar by 0.7% and against the euro by 0.75%. It was the most disastrous day in the City since Prime Minister Liz Truss’s economic policies were unleashed in September 2022.
Following the budget, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) revised its projected inflation rate for the United Kingdom. The OBR raised its forecast from 1.5% to 2.6% in 2025.
The budget included significant investments in infrastructure and state services. However, taxes were raised to the highest level since 1993. This budget echoes the policies of old Labour.
It also turns its back on the economic strategies of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, which were unleashed in 1979.
Join the Thai News forum, follow Thai Examiner on Facebook here
Receive all our stories as they come out on Telegram here
Follow Thai Examiner here
Further reading:
UK’s former ruling Conservative Party to announce a new leader on November 2 as contenders emerge
UK mother takes her family to live in Thailand to escape her own country’s cost of living crisis
New tax era in Thailand begins as Revenue now shares data with 138 countries within the OECD
Calls for clarification of new Tax regime which appears to target expat foreign income sources
10 year visa a magnet for global citizens setting up in Thailand with zero tax on offshore income
Wealthy foreigners to own small landholdings associated with homes here agreed in principle
New plan for the Thai economy could see an elite foreign visa scheme generate up to 6% of GDP
Economic plan to put the smile back in Thailand’s appeal to western foreigners to live and work
IMF urges government to loosen nation’s purse strings as finances tighten with the tax take down
Plan to allow high tech and skilled foreigners to live and work in Thailand for up to four years
